Senator Sanders a “sellout”? Puh-leez! 

I really had high hopes for Senator Sanders when he first threw his hat into the ring, because it did seem like there were a lot of people ready for this new revolution. But, as it has happened throughout history, our push to the left created an even bigger push to the right. And what has happened in cases like this in the past? A left push, a right push, a harder left, a harder right, then violence. Then whichever way the chips fall, you have the paranoia that sets in and creates tyranny so to create order. The winners are looking for a coup around every corner, their minions scoping out the “dedication” people have for their cause, getting rid of those who don’t measure up; the rest are awarded a higher authority to do the same to friends, family & neighbors. Meanwhile, those disenfranchised by the “revolution” that was supposed to be about creating a better, fairer society for everyone are further disenfranchised, angry, and persecuted.         There are levels to which these things happen in various countries and in various eras, but it’s a pretty obvious pattern on a basic level for any revolution heretofore. I suspect that, as an intelligent, educated, socialist politician, Senator Sanders is aware of this and although he has been reluctant to call it quits, he knows now how many of us there are who believe in his way of doing things, and that he will have an exceptional position within the Senate to initiate some really great changes. 

      I also think that the Senator was beginning to feel a little nervous about being put in a position of “savior” or “messiah”. He said over & over again that this movement was not simply about HIM; this was a movement by the people of this country that needed to work to change their lives & communities from the Board of elections to council representatives, mayors, governors, and on up. His withdrawal from this Presidential race is not about “selling out” as much as it is recognizing the inevitable, protecting our progressive causes, and realizing he can lead better from the Senate than from the White House. 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

It must be election season again….

…because here I am, at 2:00 a.m., worrying over and writing about Politics again!  Why tonight? The simple answer is that I’m angry.  Angry that, well….just read it- and tell me how you are feeling about it? Thanks.

I am getting really disgusted with the lot of them….Republicans and Democrats acting like Republicans….and the media shills who blatantly admit that the Trump circus is “good for business”….and that by the time the general election rolls around, they will be having “a really good year” focusing on the ugliness that the xenophobic, misogynistic, combed-over asshole that is Donald Trump.

Blackout Tuesday: The Bernie Sanders Speech Corporate Media Chose Not To Air

(hoping that link gets you to the article/video I’m referring to…..?)

Shame on the Democrats for deciding on and promising Hilary the nomination from the beginning, then acting like they’ve been trained by old Turd blossom himself, Karl Rove, setting out to destroy any and all competition. Ironically, the ideals that Bernie Sanders has had, and still believes in, USED to be the ideals of the Democratic Party. Helping those in need, advocating peace rather than war, protecting citizens from being raped—not by some mysterious “Mexican rapist” but by the financial rapists that sit in their penthouse offices on Wall Street and gamble—and LOSE–our money, investments, properties, pensions, while they cry for help from the government so they can collect their million dollar salaries and their multimillion dollar “performance bonuses”!

Yeah, I’m mad at the world today, not just because Senator Sanders lost many of the primaries in Tuesday’s vote, but because he has been treated like an invisible pariah to those in the “mainstream”. Even if you don’t like him, or you think he doesn’t have a prayer of being elected, you really should not ignore the man. Why? Because whether or not he wins the nomination, he has awakened in a generation of young people an awareness of the bullshit that’s been going on in this country’s politics for a long time, and that he has been working to try to fix for 30+ years! He’s an old guy now, but when he was a college student, he led students in Chicago to protest the segregation of black students and white students in college housing, getting arrested for leading one of the first “sit ins” of that era! And what was Hilary doing while she was in college? She was “fighting” for women and children as a member of the YOUNG REPUBLICANS! (So it’s possible we could assume that her “fight” may have been for WHITE women and children, but I really won’t go there….)

Unfortunately, because we have a capitalistic media system, one that makes money by finding the worst possible film footage or ignorant quote and playing them over and over until they can find the next “worst”, the networks (including MSNBC, sadly) ignored Senator Sanders’ speech Tuesday night because they were waiting for the chance to show all of us another disingenuously modest triumphant speech by the biggest clown this country has fallen for since Sarah Palin!

Bernie is not a charismatic buffoon. He is not a slick, pandering snake oil salesman with the ability to sound like a preacher in public and alienate everyone who has ever met him privately. He is not a tax-cutting, union-busting, petulant governor now pretending to be the “good” one in the clown car. And he is not the humiliated wife of a former President who is demanding the podium be hers after “accepting” her defeat by Barack Obama, using her wide knowledge of political tactics and ability to speak out of both sides of her mouth to engender support from the Democratic Machine.

Nope, Senator Sanders is none of those sexy, potentially headline-grabbing personalities. He is your irritatingly consistent, gruff, always serious but soft spoken Grandfather, Father, Uncle, or Neighbor who has gone about the business of governing as a SERVANT to the people of his state and country without creating fanfare, without drawing attention to himself, but always demanding that the poor, the working people, the disenfranchised, the young, the old, the black, white, hispanic, LGBT, soldiers….everyone….be allowed a fair chance of achieving the American Dream. And he’s come to the front of the line, finally, because he is aware that none of those people (US!) has that fair shot, thanks to the shenanigans (to borrow from Elizabeth Warren) of those few billionaire families, their spoiled heirs, and their hedge-fund managers who have successfully manipulated the great unwashed into believing that allowing those rich guys to take all of the money for themselves, throwing a few coins out of their pockets now and then like the float riders in a Mardi Gras parade is really what we’ve needed all along. Not only are they taking all of your money, it’s pretty likely that if you are a blue-collar working person, they’ve taken your jobs, as well….to some other country, where they can pay people who are even more desperate 25 cents an hour to do the jobs that you once had, but had the nerve to ask for a living wage and safe and sanitary working conditions.

And whether you know it or not, or whether you ask for it or not, Senator Sanders has been fighting for YOU for those 30+ years as an activist, a student, a politician. And for the media to black him out, to ignore him in favor of the cheese of the day, is just one more reason you should be paying attention. Will he win? I don’t know. Will I vote for Hillary if she is the nominee? Unfortunately, yes; the alternatives are all too dangerous. But will I work for the Sanders campaign all the way to the convention? You bet your ass I will.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Another two cents…

OK, so it’s been a while since I’ve posted anything here….I’ve been a little busy!  Three grandbabies to love and play with, an English wedding to prepare for and enjoy, and a President to get re-elected….nothing too important, but time consumiing, nonetheless!  Hahahaha!

Anyway, I’m back at the computer some more lately, and before I get going any further on the political stuff, I figured it might be a good idea to start with a pretty easy-to-read and understand overview I found yesterday that puts the “Obamacare” or “Affordable Care Act” or “Health Care Law” into a pretty straightforward timeline and explanation of what each provision means so that we all have at least a basic understanding of what is being discussed.  I have to admit, the whole thing has been pretty confusing and dry for me, and this (although it does take up some page space!) is a pretty good encapsulation of what it contains in words I can decipher. Of course, I offer a few tidbits of the political back-and-forth that has happenend before and since its passage preceeding the provisions part, hahaha.  More later, but, until then, here’s your homework: :)

THE AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE ACT

 The House passed the bill with a vote of 219 to 212 on March 21, 2010, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against it. The following day, Republicans introduced legislation to repeal the bill. Obama signed the original bill into law on March 23, 2010

The 2011 comprehensive CBO estimate projected a net deficit reduction of more than $200 billion during the period 2012–2021. CBO estimated in March 2011 that for the 2012–2021 period, the law would result in net receipts of $813 billion, offset by $604 billion in outlays, resulting in a $210 billion reduction in the deficit

(As of the bill’s passage into law in 2010, CBO estimated the legislation would reduce the deficit by $143 billion over the first decade, but half of that was due to expected premiums for the C.L.A.S.S. Act, which has since been abandoned). Although the CBO generally does not provide cost estimates beyond the 10-year budget projection period (because of the great degree of uncertainty involved in the data) it decided to do so in this case at the request of lawmakers, and estimated a second decade deficit reduction of $1.2 trillion. CBO predicted deficit reduction around a broad range of one-half percent of GDP over the 2020s while cautioning that “a wide range of changes could occur”.

In March 2010, pollsters probed the reasons for opposition. In a CNN poll, 62% of respondents said the Act would “increase the amount of money they personally spend on health care,” (which is false in nearly EVERY case!) 56% said the bill “gives the government too much involvement in health care,”(which is also FALSE, as the ACA doesn’t even have as much involvement as it does in Medicare, which is the nation’s MOST POPULAR Federal program) and only 19% said they and their families would be better off with the legislation. (Which holds true until they are actually informed of what is contained in the bill…at which point, the percentage rises to the 70’s!). In The Wall Street Journal, pollsters Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen wrote, “One of the more amazing aspects of the health-care debate is how steady public opinion has remained… 81% of voters say it’s likely the plan will end up costing more than projected [and 59%] say that the biggest problem with the health-care system is the cost: They want reform that will bring down the cost of care. For these voters, the notion that you need to spend an additional trillion dollars doesn’t make sense.”

USA Today found opinions were starkly divided by age, with a solid majority of seniors opposing the bill (due to fear that it will affect their Medicare eligibility, which it does not) and a solid majority of those younger than 40 in favor.

A June 2012 Reuters-Ipsos poll indicated that much of the opposition to the law was because Americans wanted more reform, not less. About one-third of Republicans and independents who oppose the law did so because it did not go far enough to fix healthcare. 71% of Republican opponents reject it overall, while 29% believed it did not go far enough, while independent opponents are divided 67% to 33%. Among Democratic opponents, 67% reject it overall, and 51% wanted the measure to go further.

 

The Affordable Care Act (Timeline)

Provisions

The Act is divided into 10 titles and contains provisions that became effective immediately, 90 days after enactment, and six months after enactment, as well as provisions phased in through to 2020. Below are some of the key provisions of the Act. For simplicity, the amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 are integrated into this timeline.

Effective at Enactment

  • The Food and Drug Administration is now authorized to approve generic versions of biologic drugs and grant biologics manufacturers 12 years of exclusive use before generics can be developed.
  • The Medicaid drug rebate for brand name drugs is increased to 23.1% (except the rebate for clotting factors and drugs approved exclusively for pediatric use increases to 17.1%), and the rebate is extended to Medicaid managed care plans; the Medicaid rebate for non-innovator, multiple source drugs is increased to 13% of average manufacturer price.
  • A non-profit Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is established, independent from government, to undertake comparative effectiveness research. This is charged with examining the “relative health outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness” of different medical treatments by evaluating existing studies and conducting its own. Its 19-member board is to include patients, doctors, hospitals, drug makers, device manufacturers, insurers, payers, government officials and health experts. It will not have the power to mandate or even endorse coverage rules or reimbursement for any particular treatment. Medicare may take the Institute’s research into account when deciding what procedures it will cover, so long as the new research is not the sole justification and the agency allows for public input. The bill forbids the Institute to develop or employ “a dollars per quality adjusted life year” (or similar measure that discounts the value of a life because of an individual’s disability) as a threshold to establish what type of health care is cost effective or recommended. This makes it different from the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
  • Creation of task forces on Preventive Services and Community Preventive Services to develop, update, and disseminate evidenced-based recommendations on the use of clinical and community prevention services.
  • The Indian Health Care Improvement Act is reauthorized and amended.
  • Chain restaurants and food vendors with 20 or more locations are required to display the caloric content of their foods on menus, drive-through menus, and vending machines. Additional information, such as saturated fat, carbohydrate, and sodium content, must also be made available upon request. But first, the Food and Drug Administration has to come up with regulations, and as a result, calories disclosures may not appear until 2013 or 2014.

Effective June 21, 2010

  • Adults with existing conditions became eligible to join a temporary high-risk pool, which will be superseded by the health care exchange in 2014. To qualify for coverage, applicants must have a pre-existing health condition and have been uninsured for at least the past six months. There is no age requirement. The new program sets premiums as if for a standard population and not for a population with a higher health risk. Allows premiums to vary by age (4:1), geographic area, and family composition. Limit out-of-pocket spending to $5,950 for individuals and $11,900 for families, excluding premiums.

Effective July 1, 2010

  • The President established, within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), a council to be known as the National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council to help begin to develop a National Prevention and Health Promotion Strategy. The Surgeon General shall serve as the Chairperson of the new Council.
  • A 10% sales tax on indoor tanning took effect.

Effective September 23, 2010

  • Insurers are prohibited from imposing lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits, like hospital stays, in new policies issued.
  • Dependents (children) will be permitted to remain on their parents’ insurance plan until their 26th birthday, and regulations implemented under the Act include dependents that no longer live with their parents, are not a dependent on a parent’s tax return, are no longer a student, or are married.
  • Insurers are prohibited from excluding pre-existing medical conditions (except in grandfathered individual health insurance plans) for children under the age of 19.
  • Insurers are prohibited from charging co-payments, co-insurance, or deductibles for Level A or Level B preventive care and medical screenings on all new insurance plans.
  • Individuals affected by the Medicare Part D coverage gap will receive a $250 rebate, and 50% of the gap will be eliminated in 2011. The gap will be eliminated by 2020.
  • Insurers’ abilities to enforce annual spending caps will be restricted, and completely prohibited by 2014.
  • Insurers are prohibited from dropping policyholders when they get sick.
  • Insurers are required to reveal details about administrative and executive expenditures.
  • Insurers are required to implement an appeals process for coverage determination and claims on all new plans.
  • Enhanced methods of fraud detection are implemented.
  • Medicare is expanded to small, rural hospitals and facilities.
  • Medicare patients with chronic illnesses must be monitored/evaluated on a 3-month basis for coverage of the medications for treatment of such illnesses.
  • Companies that provide early retiree benefits for individuals aged 55–64 are eligible to participate in a temporary program, which reduces premium costs.
  • A new website installed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services will provide consumer insurance information for individuals and small businesses in all states.
  • A temporary credit program is established to encourage private investment in new therapies for disease treatment and prevention.

Effective January 1, 2011

  • Insurers must spend a certain percent of premium dollars on eligible expenses, subject to various waivers and exemptions; if an insurer fails to meet this requirement, there is no penalty, but a rebate must be issued to the policyholder.
  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is responsible for developing the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation and overseeing the testing of innovative payment and delivery models.
  • Flexible spending accounts, Health reimbursement accounts and health savings accounts cannot be used to pay for over-the-counter drugs, purchased without a prescription, except insulin.

Effective January 1, 2012

  • Employers must disclose the value of the benefits they provided beginning in 2012 for each employee’s health insurance coverage on the employees’ annual Form W-2’s. This requirement was originally to be effective January 1, 2011, but was postponed by IRS Notice 2010–69 on October 23, 2010.
  • New tax reporting changes were to come in effect to prevent tax evasion by corporations. However, in April 2011, Congress passed and President Obama signed the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011 repealing this provision, because it was burdensome to small businesses. Before PPACA, businesses were required to notify the IRS on form 1099 of certain payments to individuals for certain services or property over a reporting threshold of $600. Under the repealed law, reporting of payments to corporations would also be required. Originally, it was expected to raise $17 billion over 10 years. The amendments made by Section 9006 of the Act were designed to apply to payments made by businesses after December 31, 2011, but will no longer apply because of the repeal of the section.

Effective by August 1, 2012

  • All new plans must cover certain preventive services such as mammograms and colonoscopies without charging a deductible, co-pay or coinsurance. Women’s Preventive Services – including well-woman visits, support for breastfeeding equipment, contraception and domestic violence screening – will be covered without cost sharing.

Effective by January 1, 2013

  • Income from self-employment and wages of single individuals in excess of $200,000 annually will be subject to an additional tax of 0.9%. The threshold amount is $250,000 for a married couple filing jointly (threshold applies to joint compensation of the two spouses), or $125,000 for a married person filing separately. In addition, an additional Medicare tax of 3.8% will apply to unearned income, specifically the lesser of net investment income or the amount by which adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 ($250,000 for a married couple filing jointly; $125,000 for a married person filing separately. Effective by January 1, 2014
  • Maximum Out-of-Pocket Premium Payments under PPACA by Family Size and federal poverty level: (Source: CRS)Insurers are prohibited from discriminating against or charging higher rates for any individuals based on pre-existing medical conditions.
  • Impose an annual penalty of $95, or up to 1% of income, whichever is greater, on individuals who are not covered by an acceptable insurance policy; this will rise to a minimum of $695 ($2,085 for families), or 2.5% of income, by 2016. Exemptions to the mandatory coverage provision and penalty are permitted for religious reasons or for those for whom the least expensive policy would exceed 8% of their income. On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that this penalty “must be construed as imposing a tax on those who do not have health insurance.” According to the Supreme Court, Congress does not have the power under the Commerce Clause to mandate insurance coverage, but it does have the power to levy the penalty as a tax.
  • Insurers are prohibited from establishing annual spending caps.
  • Expand Medicaid eligibility; all individuals with income up to 133% of the poverty line qualify for coverage, including adults without dependent children.
  • Two years of tax credits will be offered to qualified small businesses. In order to receive the full benefit of a 50% premium subsidy, the small business must have an average payroll per full-time equivalent (“FTE”) employee, excluding the owner of the business, of less than $25,000 and have fewer than 11 FTEs. The subsidy is reduced by 6.7% per additional employee and 4% per additional $1,000 of average compensation. As an example, a 16 FTE firm with a $35,000 average salary would be entitled to a 10% premium subsidy.
  • Impose a $2,000 per employee tax penalty on employers with more than 50 employees who do not offer health insurance to their full-time workers (as amended by the reconciliation bill).
  • For employer sponsored plans, set a maximum of $2,000 annual deductible for a plan covering a single individual or $4,000 annual deductible for any other plan (see 111HR3590ENR, section 1302). These limits can be increased under rules set in section 1302.
  • ·The CLASS Act provision would have created a voluntary long-term care insurance program, but in October 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that the provision was unworkable and would be dropped, although an Obama administration official later said the President does not support repealing this provision.
    • Pay for new spending, in part, through spending and coverage cuts in Medicare Advantage, slowing the growth of Medicare provider payments (in part through the creation of a new Independent Payment Advisory Board), reducing Medicare and Medicaid drug reimbursement rate, cutting other Medicare and Medicaid spending.
    • Revenue increases from a new $2,500 limit on tax-free contributions to flexible spending accounts (FSAs), which allow for payment of health costs.
    • Establish health insurance exchanges, and subsidization of insurance premiums for individuals in households with income up to 400% of the poverty line. To qualify for the subsidy, the beneficiaries cannot be eligible for other acceptable coverage. Section 1401(36B) of PPACA explains that the subsidy will be provided as an advanceable, refundable tax credit and gives a formula for its calculation. Refundable tax credit is a way to provide government benefit to people even with no tax liability (example: Earned Income Credit). The formula was changed in the amendments (HR 4872) passed March 23, 2010, in section 1001.

a.^ Note: In 2016, the FPL is projected to equal about $11,800 for a single person and about $24,000 for family of four..

b. ^ DHHS and CBO estimate the average annual premium cost in 2014 to be $11,328 for family of 4 without the reform.

  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on May 23, 2012, issued joint final rules regarding implementation of new state-based health insurance exchanges to cover how the exchanges will determine eligibility for uninsured individuals and employees of small businesses seeking to buy insurance on the exchanges, as well as how the exchanges will handle eligibility determinations for low-income individuals applying for newly expanded Medicaid benefits.
  • Members of Congress and their staff will only be offered health care plans through the exchange or plans otherwise established by the bill (instead of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program that they currently use).
  • A new excise tax goes into effect that is applicable to pharmaceutical companies and is based on the market share of the company; it is expected to create $2.5 billion in annual revenue.
  • Most medical devices become subject to a 2.3% excise tax collected at the time of purchase. (Reduced by the reconciliation act to 2.3% from 2.6%)
  • Health insurance companies become subject to a new excise tax based on their market share; the rate gradually rises between 2014 and 2018 and thereafter increases at the rate of inflation. The tax is expected to yield up to $14.3 billion in annual revenue.
  • The qualifying medical expenses deduction for Schedule A tax filings increases from 7.5% to 10% of earned income.

Effective by January 1, 2015

  • Physicians’ payments from federally funded programs such as Medicare will be modified to be based on the quality of care, not the volume

Leave a comment

Filed under Health, Politics

LeBron moving his kingdom?

Well, it’s over…the hype, the questions, the drama…four weeks of waiting for “The Decision” to be made by The Chosen One.  And up until yesterday, I was pretty sure Lebron would stay here in Akron…I was hoping he would, anyway.  And judging by the reaction of so many people around here, his decision to play for Miami is not a popular one in Northeast Ohio! Some folks sound downright bitter about it, some are claiming that it’s no big deal because he’s just another spoiled athlete who has achieved hero status but who hasn’t contributed anything worthwhile to his hometown.   I disagree.  No, I STRONGLY disagree.

Lebron James has brought more to Cleveland and NE Ohio than any sports figure in recent history.  He brought a LOT of money to the businesses in Cleveland; he brought a sense of pride and excitement and yes, HOPE, for at least one sports team here; and he’s given a lot of money to a lot of people and organizations.  He’s also been influential in inspiring inner city kids to get fit, read, do their schoolwork, and to strive for better things.  This area will surely feel the impact of his departure very quickly. 

He has become a hero to many youngsters for good reason: he has been an outspoken and loyal advocate for Akron; he ALWAYS has put  kids first when throngs of autograph and picture seekers surround him; and he’s been the epitome of what a best friend, and son, should be to those closest to him. However, Lebron has also always advocated pursuing your dreams, doing your very best to achieve your goals, respecting your god-given talents and using them as they should be used.  He has somehow managed to do all of this by the time he turned 25…good god! If those are not heroic qualities, I don’t know what they are. 

Do I wish he would stay?  Most definitely!  But that’s for purely selfish reasons…just like everyone else who has come to know, respect, and care for this young man, I like sort of “claiming” him as “one of us”.  It’s fun to feel like we are a part of something special, something extraordinary.  With all due respect for Drew Carey and Jim Brown, Lebron James has become synonymous with Cleveland, and in an “A-list” kind of way.  He is a genuine talent who could change the game of basketball…and in so doing, change the course of history…and that is very exiting.  But of course, I don’t really have a claim on him just because he’s from my hometown and I like the pride I feel when I boast about him to pals in other cities, right?  No, he’s paid his dues, he’s done his part for this city and the one to the north, and now he needs to step out of this NE Ohio shadow and do what he needs to do to grow; he needs to do what he has to do for himself.  And right now that means he has to step out into the Miami sunshine, learn from other great players, learn from his new coach and the genius of Pat Riley, and take the step up to the next level.  Because you can only give as much as you’ve got…and Lebron has given a lot…if you try to do more than that, you burn yourself out and you are no good to yourself or anyone else, no matter how hard you try. 

So far, Lebron has managed to avoid the ever-enticing pitfalls of many in the NBA…he still seems fairly grounded, doesn’t appear to be chasing skirts or doing drugs, and has made his decision based on finding a team he can work with to win the Championship ring he seeks. So, although I agree with many that the WAY he made his announcement was pretty narcissistic, over the top, and just a little bit silly, still, I like the guy and I hope he finds what he’s looking for.

I wonder if he’ll still shop at Target in Miami?

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

A borrowed bit of info

          Here’s a piece from a Daily Kos diarist about how Fox News covered the President’s signing of the Health Care Reform Act. Just in case any of you are still harboring any thought that Fox may be either FAIR or BALANCED:

I’m just going to let the facts speak for themselves on this one — to borrow a phrase, I’ll report, and you decide. At issue: the lead segment of Fox’s first “news” broadcast after President Obama signed the landmark health care reform legislation into law.

The segment was almost eight minutes long, but less than half a minute was spent on the bill signing. There was no reporting whatsoever on the actual consequences of the legislation’s passage or the road ahead on reconciliation.

Here’s a tick-tock I put together so you can see at a glance what Fox covered:

First: Kelly spends 50 seconds teasing upcoming segments
      – Release of 9/11 organizer?
      – Brit Hume on attacks on Pelosi, Biden dropping f-bomb
      – Volcanic eruption in Iceland
Second: Kelly spends six minutes reporting five stories
      – Report on air travel overhau-l 65 seconds;
       – Attacks on climate legislation- 35 seconds
       – Obama signs reform bill with Pelosi standing- 25 seconds
       – New poll shows top Democrats like Pelosi are unpopular- 60 seconds
       – ACORN national organization shutting down- 175 seconds
Third: Kelly spends another 60 seconds teasing upcoming segments
     – 9/11 organizer released?
      – Volcanic eruption in Iceland
       As you can see, the story that received the most coverage (with nearly three minutes of airtime) was a report on ACORN folding its national operations. A report on a poll purporting to show the unpopularity of Democrats got more than twice as much coverage as the bill signing.

         I have to admit, I can’t watch Fox News as it airs because if I watch more than a few minutes at a time I want to pull off my ears and climb under my covers forever, so I have to watch the bits and pieces that find their way to YouTube or that are replayed on Olberman or Rachel Maddow or in the lefty blogs.
         Because I can’t watch it for myself, I don’t know how much coverage they actually have given to other stories floating around the blogosphere; the five episodes that the FBI is investigating, for instance, regarding threats against “Democrat” lawmakers’ children who vote for the Health Care Bill.
          I’m curious as to how much coverage they’ve given to the likes of the tea bagger/militia freaks who are advocating (and acting out) throwing bricks through the windows of progressive legislators and organizations all over the country.
          I wonder what the chatterbugs on Fox are saying about the ignorant lunatics who are encouraging those who disagree with Health Care supporters to take their guns to the streets…in particular, the streets of Washington D.C. on April 19….IN HONOR of the Waco/Ruby Ridge/Oklahoma City tragedies, of course. (Whaaaaaaat?)

       My instincts tell me that their coverage has been less than enthusiastic, considering the latest Harris poll, which surveyed 2,230 people right at the height of the health-care reform debate, shows how Republicans feel overall about President Obama:
          • 67 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Americans overall) believe that Obama is a   socialist.
          • 57 percent of Republicans (32 percent overall) believe that Obama is a Muslim
          • 45 percent of Republicans (25 percent overall) agree with the Birthers in their belief that  Obama was “not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president”
          • 38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is “doing many of the things that Hitler did”
          • Scariest of all, 24 percent of Republicans (14 percent overall) say that Obama “may be the Antichrist.” (Again….Whaaaaaaat?)
           The poll also clearly shows that education makes a difference in how people respond to this kind of garbage- people without a college education are much more likely to believe such claims, while Americans with college degrees or better are less easily duped.
           But then again, the Republican belief that only those people deemed by God (or the leaders of the Republican Party) to be worthy should be allowed to be educated reveals its value here.   Because how much easier is it to behave without fear of consequences if “the people” are wallowing in their own stupidity and not paying attention? The strategy of promoting a constituency happy to remain willfully ignorant of actual policy or fact in favor of forming opinions based on personality has had an impact, to be sure, although whether or not that impact is the one they were looking for is still a question.
       I do wonder what will happen when those angry people wake up and realize how much the “worthy” politicians they follow like sheep actually despise them. Or how they will react when they discover that the “information” they’ve been fed has actually been a series of smoke and mirrors intended to keep them in the dark.
       Waterloo, indeed.

Leave a comment

Filed under 1

The subject of diamonds….

        My birthday is today.  Danny and I went out with some good friends last night, the kids and grandbaby came over tonight, and  it was a really lovely, easygoing weekend.   It was not without a little controversy, however! 

         On Friday afternoon, before our dinner date, my husband of thirty years presented me with a birthday gift that was as surprising as it was beautiful.  He gave me a pair of  rose colored gold teardrop earrings, the center filled with clusters of little diamonds.  And as amazing as they are, and as thoughtful as my husband was trying to be, I’ve decided that I cannot accept them, and have asked him to take them back.  When I told this to my friends on Friday night, their mouths dropped open and they looked at me like I’m crazy.  My kids think I’m crazy, but they also say they aren’t surprised,  and Danny, while he was a little pissed off at first, now says he totally understands….I’m hoping that’s true! 

        So why am I not accepting such a loving gift?  Well,  I hate to admit it, but this is truly a political position; its a position I also have to admit that I’m sort of surprised that I feel so strongly about.  But if you know anything about diamonds, and the diamond industry, those shiny little pieces of rock tend to lose their luster when you realize how enmeshed they are in violence, war, greed, and unbelieveable crimes against humanity.  Just a few pictures edited together by a young woman I found on youtube:

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/conflict-diamonds/2962276781

While jewelers in the U.S. are quick to reassure consumers of diamonds that the war in Sierra Leone is over, and that they have all signed an agreement not to traffic in blood/conflict diamonds, the watchdog group Global Witness, which has been monitoring the diamond trade since the year 2000, counters:

 From GLOBAL WITNESS on Feb. 8, 2010

Tainted Love: blood diamonds still cast shadow over Valentines Day

“Consumer pressure will be vital to ensure that the diamond industry finally acts to eliminate conflict diamonds once and for all,” said Elly Harrowell, campaigner at Global Witness.  “Some progress has been made in recent years but the unpalatable truth is that around the world civilians are still suffering terribly as a consequence of the diamond trade.”

In 2003, following a global outcry about the problem of conflict diamonds, an international certification scheme was established to monitor the trade. Countries who signed up to the Kimberley Process were obliged to demonstrate that their diamonds were not bankrolling brutality and conflict. 

 The polished and retail sectors of the diamond industry opposed stringent government regulation when the Kimberley Process was being negotiated, and the industry was left to police itself.

         International diamond trade bodies have issued countless press releases and statements claiming that the problem has been solved, but have provided little information on what they have actually done to fix it and fulfill their promises. Despite vast profits made by many in the diamond industry ( – in 2005 diamond jewelry sales were over US $60 billion -) little has been invested to ensure that blood diamonds will not be able to enter the legitimate trade. (By the way, NONE of the money gathered by the diamond merchants has made it to the people who spend their lives digging up the diamonds.  As a matter of fact, almost none of the men, women and children who work in the diamond mining industry has ever even seen a polished diamond!)

 From The Diamond High Council (HRD) (the official representative of the Belgian diamond industry) 

“Experts agree that today it is scientifically not possible to determine the exact origin of an individual diamond.  Although projects are in development, it will take several years before a technique will be operational for commercial purposes.

In order to respect the embargo and end the conflicts, workable and immediately applicable solutions had to be found.  That was done through a system of certifications, established by the legitimate governments. As it appears that certificates can also be forged and diamonds could be commercialised through third countries, a more global solution has to be found.”

The HRD Conclusion:

“One cannot blame the diamond industry not to be able to prevent every small scale smuggling across the African borders and at the same time close the eyes for tanks and aircrafts full of weapons crossing that same border in the opposite direction. And a conflict needs oil, if it isn’t in the ground as natural resource then to fuel military machinery. The only difference between a diamond and a conflict diamond is the conflict. End the conflict and there are only diamonds, diamonds that bring prosperity for producing countries.”

Hmmm….yes, well,  for me, that means there will  be no diamonds. 

 

1 Comment

Filed under Personal politics

My first blog is necessarily political…

Hi all,

I’m not sure yet how this blog thing works…most of you know my love for “facebook” and the like…but my hope here is to have an interesting and interactive blog that will combine discussions of several of my seemingly wildly diverse topics: Politics, Art, Writing, Theater, and, of course, Grandchildren! 

My first blog, perhaps fittingly, is a political one, as I post while watching the Health Care Summit winding down as I write.  Here we go…..

The reason so many of us worked hard to elect President Obama has become the reason for our greatest disappointment.  His (and our) belief that we really can “all just get along” has been shown to be a naïve, unrealistic vision too noble for the scheming pack dogs in Washington D.C.  The Republicans have taken full advantage of his stated pledge to be bipartisan, and has resulted in creating more gridlock and, ironically, more partisanship than ever in attempts to create the changes he promised during the election.  Elected Democrats have embarrassed themselves and those of us aligned with that party by running for cover and ducking responsibility when Republicans spin their decidedly bigoted and hateful worldview, allowing the President to fend for himself against forces that have a stated agenda of making sure that he fails in every effort. 

              It is laughable to hear Republicans claim to know “what the American people want” since they are so expert at twisting both the questions and answers to fit their view. That Republicans claim their constituents have a clear idea of what the “nearly 2,000 page” health care bill entails and are able to discern what is best for them is a joke…those making that claim have complained incessantly about the size of the bill and the time and effort it would take to “wade through” it…even though that is exactly why they are elected as our representatives.  If those representatives can’t bother to read such an important bill, how can we believe them when they claim that it is not in the best interest of the American people?  We can’t, and we shouldn’t.  What political hacks like John “Boner” and Eric Kantor count on is our belief that our representatives actually act in our best interests.  What this debate has revealed in the past year is just how wrong that assumption is. The best interests of the American people come a very distant second to the best interests of the American Corporations.

Hmmm….Do I sound bitter?  :)

4 Comments

Filed under Health, Politics